Now, it's difficult to concentrate on the first track of any record when the packaging smells so damn good as the crispy sugar-papery inlay of 65daysofstatic's new record. God, it's like being in year 3 and sticking a really good drawing of a Roman Centurion on the wall… Right, well, once we've rewound and put the inlay DOWN we can see what these Sheffield industrial post-rock techno disaster-masters have given us for their third full-length release. And the first track, 'When We Were Younger & Better', oh… it sounds like the last record. Well, "nothing wrong with that!" you'd presumably yell. And no, there's not a great deal wrong with it, and I'm not even going to hilariously 'riff' on the title's aptness, but it's all a little bit too safe to make it worth considering.
One expects, particularly with a post-rock ensemble so tipped and honed as this one, a third record to be about flexing your muscles now you're established. So yeah, ignore the complex time signatures and bombastic 5th interval guitar lines of that first track and run along straight to about 3:10 in the second track, 'A Failsafe'. Shit, that's some exhilarating drumming, as desert-dry as a thwack can come when it's nearly inaudibly accompanied by weird burblesome electronic whizzes. Then, triumph on triumph, we're back in with that familiar fists-aloft punch-along riot-cum-chorus that we know 65days do like no other. Tremendous.
It doesn't last, though. Soon, we reach again for the sweet-smelling inlay littered with artwork that GY!BE would probably say is "a bit too… us". We struggle to find the outstanding moments that flowed so freely and continuously on their previous two records, and when they do come they're a little lost in a mire of Tupperware-sealed production. The Destruction of Small Ideas should probably be played unreasonably loudly at all times so it can have its full effect, but that's just not all that reasonable. We want it to be better, but the sad fact is that 65days have been done in by the very high standards they set themselves. The instant they start to coast you know the fire that fuelled previous work is in danger of being extinguished.
But remember who you're dealing with. 65daysofstatic are still one of the most technically gifted and sonically finest bands on the planet. So when they coast you're still guaranteed at least some return on your investment. One moment we're in rather aimless drudgery in the opening to 'Wax Futures', the next we're enjoying the daft Casio beats, welcome extra instrumentation and warring tonalities of 'These Things You Can't Unlearn'. It's a constantly perplexing record, and too much to endure in one sitting.
The crucial thing with previous 65days records was the fog, the dense mist you could get lost in happily for an hour. The difference with The Destruction… is that you don't want to get lost here because you'll probably never find your way back, no matter how well you laid your Breadcrumb Trail. And at over an hour in length, it's a very long way to go. To evoke that insane confusion might well have been the plan. If so, 65days are scary now. If not, then they're still scary. We just don't know why yet. But while you're wondering, maybe give that inlay a little sniff… mmm…
this album
is better than you think it is.
so there.
65*daysofstatic - The Destruction of Small Ideas
it's an alright album when you look at it but it's nothing compared to 'The Fall of Math'. They've sort of lost their originality with it.
very underrated
MAYBE not as good as OTFAT and Fall of math, but its still a corker. no way in hell its a 6.
definately a grower - many layers to appreciate, much more complexities, experimentation with different instuments and guests on the album. and you didn't even mention Conspiracy of Seeds!
and yes - one to be played loudly. and to be listened to - it doesn't jump out as much as fall of math because the song structures aren't so immediate and simple.
9/10 FTW
I just read this because I wanted to hear about Circle Takes the Square.
I've seen - and loved - 65's live shows a generous handful of times, and I own The Fall of Math. And it's good, don't get me wrong, but I've never been as thrilled by it is as their shows. And that's always out me off buying the second album, and now this.
Am I wrong though? Is it worth getting another?
P.S. Circle!
get the second one
it's ace. not this one though. not bad, but not great.
Yes
The albums really grown on me. The songs seem so much better than the older ones when you see them live. First of all I wasn't so keen but it really has so much variety which maybe my only criticism of them before.
Plus its turned me on to Circle Takes the Square who are really amazing.
I'd give it a nine but only cos the quiet bits are drowned out by my computer, birds, the wind etc...
Seconded
This is far more rewarding on 10th+ listening than the previous albums.
.
Good review.
However, I think it's better than their last effort and on par with The Fall Of Math. When We Were Younger & Better, Don't Go Down To Sorrow, Dance Parties, Peaks and also the rather enigmatic Conspiracy of Seeds all far surpass anything they're done before. So there.
Except I Swallowed Hard, and Await Rescue.
Gets an 8 from me.
*they've
obvs.
AND
you didn't actually mention the Conspiracy of Seeds. Not once! When they do finally rip the tape from their gobs, they're angry, ferocious and downright terrifying. But I dunno which vocals belong to which band, cause they got Circle Takes The Square in for some of them..
Yeah. It's amazing.
And yes, the cover is nice.
Mmmm.
Consensus seems to be
that it's not as good as previous albums. I shelved Fall of Math after three listens on account of it running short on ideas apart from the obvious "lets' make generic post rock with clicks in it".
Maybe I'll like this...keen to give it a go!
.
fair review I'd say.
and
a very well written one.
Some reviewers would have ended up sounding like they couldn't make their mind up on whether it was a good record or not, Daniel made his point very clear, and sounded really reasonable whenever adding criticism.
God, it's like I'm reviewing a review.
I thought it was a harsh Review
Then again I'm not the one reviewing it. I really like the songs 'Eastern European Dance Parties' and 'A Failsafe' (kinda sounds a bit like At the Drive-In guitarwise)
Yeah its definatly no 'Fall of Math' but it still has a lot of moments on it.
the vocals
on the last track are all circle takes the square
The album
I rarely buy an album without listening beforehand but I so much like the band that I just waited for the release and coughed up my £10 quid. My first reaction was one of disappointment but I like music that's challenging (like say Laymar - who don't have a release but take some getting used to). I'm into my third or fourth play now and the whole album is growing on me. For me though it lacks tension and atmosphere which I look for in postrock. Everything is tight and the album highlights what good musicians they are. I bought Grails and Jakob at the same time and they are both more melodic and again that disappoints me a little bit with 'The destruction of Small ideas'. Seven out of ten though, 6 is mean.
It's worth 6
just for ...dance parties alone.
Ok, maybe not. I found (and still find, though not as much), that except for the first track, the first half of the album isn't that great, but the second half is frippin' awesome.
8 could be a mite generous, but that's what i'd give it.
A 6?!
Are you mad? This record deserves an 8, and nothing lower.
The presence of Circle Takes The Square almost merits a perfect 10, but I'll be fair on this. It's really a good album. It takes some getting use to, but it's worth the work.
In other news, I really wish CTTS would put out a new record. Their appearance here is great, but I'd be happy if they'd put out at least one other album. I'd be really unhappy if they split after a stellar release like As The Roots Undo. But, that's just me.
No that's me too.
And probably lots of other people. CTTS are fucking brilliant.
.
the production is a bit naff really, drums don't sound flat as fuck
.
they DO sound flat as fuck, I meant ;)
Well..
I think the drum-flatness is intentional
Nevertheless
It's still a great record.
Doesn't quite reach the standards of Radio Protector, but still has the vastness of TheFallOfMath.
8/10
thisisa65state
Hmm
Radio Protector isn't even that good by their standards. I really don't know why everyone loves it so much. It always seems to get the biggest cheers.
i was first dissappointed
now i've listened to the album loads, it is a grower, what with a song like "a failsafe" its an 8 for me cos there other two are 10's for me. good album
this is a proper grower
it really does need to be played at loudest volume possible
phat rave!
I completely agree about the volume. Whereas it's not my favourite release by the 65 guys (Hole EP OWNS) it is an awesome work of music. The CTTS appearance on the last track makes what was one of my most antcipated releases for this year even better.
Also Rolo Tomassi who supported them when we went to see them in Sheffield are a phat rave too, check them out.
Also
Josh T. Pearson supported them recently and he's better.
what a dull band
All substance-less bombast and no subtlety. It's like being bludgeoned over the head repeatedly.
So many other artists combine "post rock" and electronica better. Port-Royal, Mogwai, Epic45...
epic45..
..are utter gash.
Hmm
Good review, if a little harsh maybe. I'd agree with other posters that they have lost a bit of their originality, but I have really enjoyed this album. I'd give it a 7 or even an 8.